Users review: With Hollywood at a loss to make the original film, it was inevitable that the Robocop series will eventually get a reboot. In 1987 became the original Robocop an instant hit at the box office with its blend of witty satire and over the top violence, as well as top notch acting by Peter Weller, Kurtwood Smith and Ronny Cox, the decisive factor that made the movie so fresh at the time, was additionally holandie? s director Paul Verhoeven, who seems to understand what the audience time needed: high-tech Cyborg (artfully designed special effects whiz Rob Bottin and its robotic suit has become a film icon), who fought against crime in a nutritional ; our future world overwhelmed by greed, hypocrisy, corruption and exaggerated, almost cartoonish violence.In it rebooting, studies buys the services of Brazilian director Jose Padiham (directed Elite Squad and its sequel two intense police thriller in his native Brazil), but unfortunately they forgot to give him a good script to work with (there were rumors during the production of Padiham had a lot of ideas that nixed Studio managers. slide.). The second reason that the original film did well was because of its R rating was working in his favor: very bloodletting added to its satirical view of the future, as well as the American culture that really spoke to the crowd . With this reboot, aimed at the more family-friendly crowds, the PG-rated violence filmed by rapid jump cuts, which makes it quite confusing, it's like watching a game to fast forward to the moment when your brain registers what is happening on stage, finished.The film itself also suffers from pacing problems, just when the story is about to steam ahead, suddenly change the scene so that any emotional momentum is lost, because it just is not much description of the main ingredients in all that competent ; ver be emotional impact will be glossed over with a jump to a new scene, with too much emphasis on explanations of the characters makes it so that the audience can not win sympathy anybody.I can not really Joel Kinna's judge is acting in the title role, as there really is not much for him to do except walk around Robocop costume and say a few words now and then, he seems fo , r to spend too much time and bug-eyed shock more than anything else. The roles also seem to be useless with Michael Keaton and Jackie Earle Haley screen time is largely limited to trying to explain what is happening instead fo , r to actually do something. Although Michael K Williams seems lost Robocop helper. Patrick Garrow how hard is pretty much a cardboard villain, compared to the 1987 version of the menacing Kurtwood Smith and his gang of murderous psychopaths. Gary Oldman's performance is pretty much average, and because hes got not much to do.Alas, is the biggest disappointment the lack of any kind of movie sense: the 1987 film had boatloads of wacky ad Breaking the story, however, with an excellent view and that in the future the world was created, like crazy, sadistic villains and puns on the name of the main baddie (Dick Jones the best name ever ). Instead, we are fragments of news media performance by Samuel L. Jackson, whose presence in the film is wasted, since he spends more time recapping what we have seen, his jokes fall flat.The only good scene going well at the beginning of the battle between the rebels and the Iranian robot army, but soon after that the film drops off quickly and never recovered it. Better to skip this and wait for the lease, or better yet, watch the 1987 version-road better. |
142 Seeds
92 Peers
Torrent Health
19
3
No comments:
Post a Comment